Terminal loop sequences in viral double-stranded RNAs modulate RIG-I signaling

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.

RSV cbVG sequences 1–48 and 39–68 are immunostimulatory. (A) Indicated deletion versions of RSV cbVG 236 were generated by in vitro transcription, then 1 pmol of IVT RNA was transfected into A549 cells. Gray boxes represent complementary regions (Comp.) of the cbVG. (B) Expression of IFNL1 was measured by qPCR at 6 hpt. One-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD post hoc test was performed for statistical analysis. (ns) P > 0.05, (**) P < 0.01, (***) P < 0.001, (****) P < 0.0001. Data are represented as fold change over cbVG 236. (C) Predicted structure of RNA stem–loops from RSV cbVG 236. (D) Sequences from RSV cbVG 236 were attached to X RNA and then in vitro transcribed. One picomole of RNA was transfected into A549 cells, and expression of IFNB1 and IFNL1 was measured by qPCR at 6 hpt. One-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD post hoc test was performed for statistical analysis. (ns) P > 0.05, (*) P < 0.05, (**) P < 0.01, (***) P < 0.001, (****) P < 0.0001. Data are represented as fold change over the X RNA control. Data reported are biological triplicates.

This Article

  1. RNA 32: 802-811