Evaluation of novel computational methods to identify RNA-binding protein footprints from structural data

  1. Gene W. Yeo1,2,3,28,29
  1. 1Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037, USA
  2. 2Institute for Genomic Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037, USA
  3. 3Sanford Stem Cell Institute and Stem Cell Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92037, USA
  4. 4School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 8410501, Israel
  5. 5School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
  6. 6Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
  7. 7Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Geneva, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
  8. 8Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (SISSA), 34136 Trieste, Italy
  9. 9Pingyuan Laboratory, Xinxiang 453007, Henan, China
  10. 10Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Life Sciences, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
  11. 11State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
  12. 12MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology & Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, Center for Synthetic and Systems Biology, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  13. 13Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1H9, Canada
  14. 14Institute of Computing Science, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland
  15. 15Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, 61-704 Poznan, Poland
  16. 16Computational and Chemical Biology, Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), I-16163 Genova, Italy
  17. 17Department of Biomolecular Sciences, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, 61029 Urbino, Italy
  18. 18Department of Genomics and Computational Biology, University of Massachusetts, Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, USA
  19. 19Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China
  20. 20Department of Computer Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada
  21. 21State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology, Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structures, Tsinghua-Peking Joint Center for Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  22. 22Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1H9, Canada
  23. 23Department of Computer Science, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel
  24. 24The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan 5290002, Israel
  25. 25Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA
  26. 26Genome Center, University of California Davis, Davis, California 95616, USA
  27. 27Department of Biology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467, USA
  28. 28Sanford Laboratories for Innovative Medicine, La Jolla, California 92037, USA
  29. 29Center for RNA Technologies and Therapeutics, La Jolla, California 92037, USA
  1. Corresponding authors: saviran{at}ucdavis.edu, m.meyer{at}bc.edu, geneyeo{at}ucsd.edu
  1. 30 These authors contributed equally to this work.

  2. Handling editor: Mihaela Zavolan

Abstract

RNA-binding proteins (RBP) play diverse roles in mRNA processing and function. However, from thousands of RBPs encoded in the human genome, a detailed molecular understanding of their interactions with RNA is available only for a small fraction. In most cases, our knowledge of the combination of RNA sequence and structure required for specific RBP binding is insufficient for accurately predicting binding sites transcriptome-wide. In this context, the rapidly expanding collection of transcriptomic data sets that map distinct, yet intertwined posttranscriptional marks, such as RNA structure and RBP binding, presents an opportunity for integrative analysis to better characterize RBP binding. A grand challenge faced by our community is that relatively little information on the secondary structure context within and near RBP-binding sites has been gleaned from integrating such data sets, partially due to lack of suitable computational methods. To engage scientists from diverse backgrounds in addressing this gap, the RNA Society organized the RBP Footprint Grand Challenge in 2021, an international community effort to develop new methods or leverage existing ones for predicting RBP-binding sites through analysis of a growing volume of sequence, structure, and binding data and to experimentally validate select predictions. Here, we report the initiative, analyses, and methods developed by the participants, validation results, and five new in vivo binding data sets generated for validation. We hope our work will inspire additional innovation in computational methods, further utilization of available data resources, and future endeavors to engage the community in collaborating toward closing other critical data-analysis gaps.

Keywords

  • Received August 5, 2024.
  • Accepted April 19, 2025.

This article is distributed exclusively by the RNA Society for the first 12 months after the full-issue publication date (see http://rnajournal.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After 12 months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

| Table of Contents