E. coli 6S RNA complexed to RNA polymerase maintains product RNA synthesis at low cellular ATP levels by initiation with noncanonical initiator nucleotides

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.

NAD(H) and FAD-modified pRNA products produced in vitro. (A) Denaturing gel analysis of NAD(H) containing pRNAs produced in vitro. (B) APB denaturing gel analysis of the same samples. Both gels in panels A and B were resolved using 20% denaturing PAGE. (C) RNA processing by CIP, RppH and NudC. The shared adenosine diphosphate is shown in black, whereas the differing upstream moiety is shown in red. X refers to a 5′ cap. (D) 5′ processing of in vitro synthesized pRNA using γ-32P ATP and processed with CIP and RppH. (E) 5′ processing of in vitro synthesized α-32P UTP radiolabeled pRNA species using CIP, RppH, and NudC. “(pp)A” refers to the 5′ terminal end of pRNAs containing either “ppA” or “A” (5′-OH), as these pRNA species migrate with similar velocities. 5′-triphosphorylated (“pppA”) pRNAs (ATP ± CIP conditions) shown in panel E run faster than A-pRNAs, given that pppA–pRNAs have more negative charges. The pA–pRNAs migrate faster than the pppA–pRNAs (panel E, lanes ATP ± RppH) due to less weight. These band patterns reflect a mixture of pRNAs initiated with a capped adenosine (slower mobility; NAD[H] or FAD) or ATP (fast mobility). Low amounts of HNppA–pRNA (NADH–pRNA) band are likely due to 5′ oxidation, resulting in +NppA–pRNA (NAD+-pRNA). The ppA–pRNAs are assumed to have come from cap degradation. Samples in panels D and E were normalized to the same pRNA specific activity after Mango purification and resolved using 23% denaturing PAGE containing 0.25% APB.

This Article

  1. RNA 28: 1643-1658