Comparing RNA secondary structures using a relaxed base-pair score
Abstract
The use of free energy-based algorithms to compute RNA secondary structures produces, in general, large numbers of foldings. Recent research has addressed the problem of grouping structures into a small number of clusters and computing a representative folding for each cluster. At the heart of this problem is the need to compute a quantity that measures the difference between pairs of foldings. We introduce a new concept, the relaxed base-pair (RBP) score, designed to give a more biologically realistic measure of the difference between structures than the base-pair (BP) metric, which simply counts the number of base pairs in one structure but not the other. The degree of relaxation is determined by a single relaxation parameter, t. When t = 0, (no relaxation) our method is the same as the BP metric. At the other extreme, a very large value of t will give a distance of 0 for identical structures and 1 for structures that differ. Scores can be recomputed with different values of t, at virtually no extra computation cost, to yield satisfactory results. Our results indicate that relaxed measures give more stable and more meaningful clusters than the BP metric. We also use the RBP score to compute representative foldings for each cluster.
Keywords
- RNA secondary structure
- consensus structure
- minimum free energy structure
- medioid structure
- centroid structure
- cluster
- k-means clustering
- spectral clustering
- base-pair metric
- relaxed base-pair score
- representative structure
Footnotes
-
Reprint requests to: Michael Zuker, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, USA; e-mail: zukerm{at}rpi.edu; fax: (518) 276-4824.
-
Abbreviations: mfe, minimum free energy; BP, base pair (in the context of base-pair metric or base-pair score); RBP, relaxed base pair (score).
-
Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are at http://www.rnajournal.org/cgi/doi/10.1261/rna.903510.
-
- Received December 24, 2009.
- Accepted February 3, 2010.
- Copyright © 2010 RNA Society










