Structural organization of a viral IRES depends on the integrity of the GNRA motif

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.

Chemical probing of mutants in the GNRA motif of FMDV IRES. Domain 3 prepared in vitro was annealed to a 5′ end-labeled antisense primer and used as template in a reverse transcriptase reaction. A sequence ladder generated with the same labeled antisense primer was run in parallel to identify extension products; residues are marked on the left as the complementary sense sequence. Lane 1 shows the cDNA products obtained after primer extension of unmodified RNA. Lanes 2 and 3 show primer extension products of the RNA treated with dimethyl sulfate (DMS) in native (N) or denaturing (D) conditions. Filled dots in lane 2 depict the residues that halted RT elongation in DMS-treated RNA, and residues protected from DMS modification are denoted by open circles in lane 3. Transcripts bearing the UCCG or GUAG domain 3 were incubated with DMS in parallel to the wild type. Filled or empty dots point to the residues, marked on the left, which halted RT-elongation in DMS-treated GUAA RNA. Changes observed in GUAG and UCCG mutants are indicated by asterisks (new RT-stop), empty arrow-heads (lack of RT-stop relative to the GUAA RNA), or filled arrows (lack of protection relative to the GUAA RNA), and are listed on the right side of the autoradiogram.

This Article

  1. RNA 9: 1333-1344