Improved precision, sensitivity, and adaptability of ordered two-template relay cDNA library preparation for RNA sequencing

TABLE 4.

Impact of adapter template UMI sequence on complete 5′-end capture

Fig. 3′r/ddC adapter template sequence 3′r/ddC adapter template # RNA 3′r/ddC adapter template end CV Mean difference CI 95% Adjusted P-value miRNA (n) 5′ precision
4B NNNC-3′ 6 3′-OH 1.07 4.92% (4.64%−5.21%) 8×10−160 902 0.7
4B NNNNNYC-3′ 6 3′-OH 0.65 3.3% (2.99%−3.62%) 2.8×10−74 903 0.68
4B NNNNNAC-3′ 6 3′-OH 0.72 10.1% (9.56%−10.65%) 8×10−176 889 0.75
4B NNNNNGC-3′ 6 3′-OH 0.73 10.45% (9.98%–10.91%) 2×10−221 883 0.75
4B NNNNNRC-3′ 6 3′-OH 0.81 11.54% (11.04%–12.03%) 3×10−232 881 0.76
4C NNNNNYC-3′ 2 3′-OH 0.66 −3.4% (−3.56% to −3.23%) 4×10−202 904 0.66
4C NNNNNYC-3′ 2 3′-OH 0.65 −3.35% (−3.51% to −3.18%) 7×10−196 904 0.66
4C NNNNNDC-3′ 1 3′-H 0.68 2.95% (2.73%–3.17%) 1×10−112 904 0.72
4C NNNNNDC-3′ 1 3′-H 0.69 2.24% (2.02%–2.46%) 1.1×10−72 904 0.71
4C NNNNNDC-3′ 0 3′-H 0.68 8.46% (8.21%–8.71%) 0 904 0.78
4C NNNNNDC-3′ 0 3′-H 0.66 8.53% (8.3%–8.77%) 0 904 0.78
4C NNNNNAC-3′ 0 3′-H 0.56 7.87% (7.37%–8.36%) 2×10−141 904 0.77
4C NNNNNGC-3′ 0 3′-H 0.61 8.06% (7.62%–8.49%) 1×10−175 903 0.77
4C NNNNNRC-3′ 0 3′-H 0.62 10.05% (9.64%–10.46%) 2×10−249 904 0.79
  • Figure panel and descriptions of the 3′-adapter template (3′ sequence, number of RNA nucleotides, and whether the 3′ end was unblocked, i.e., 3′-OH, or blocked, i.e., 3′-hydrogen [3′-H]) are described in the first four columns. See Table 5 for complete adapter template sequences. The mean difference in 5′ precision and a 95% confidence interval were computed from a paired, two-sided Student's t-test, with Bonferroni adjusted P-values. For Figure 4B, all libraries were compared to a library prepared with no UMI in the 3′rC adapter template, and for Figure 4C, all libraries were compared to a library prepared with 3′rC adapter template with 6-RNA ribonucleotides and a 3′-OH with the following 3′ sequence: NNNNNYC-3′.

This Article

  1. RNA 31: 224-244