RNA fold prediction by Monte Carlo in graph space and the statistical mechanics of tertiary interactions

TABLE 3.

List of targets in the Rzs test set with only secondary interactions in their native structures, giving PDB code and sequence length of each in parentheses

Rzs secondary test set
1KXK (70) 1U9S (161) 2KXM (27) 2LU0 (49) 2MI0 (22)
2MIS (26) 2MTJ (47) 2N3Q (62) 2N3R (62) 2OEU (66)
2OIU (71) 2QUS (69) 2R8S (159) 359D (44) 3BBM (67)
3D2V (77) 3E5C (53) 3F2X (112) 3GS5 (64) 3OXE (88)
3PDR (161) 4GXY (172) 4R4V (186) 4RUM (92) 4Y1M (107)
4YAZ (84) 5DH6 (68) 5LYS (57) 5NDH (16) 5T83 (89)
5U3G (85) 5U6Z (68) 5UZ6 (32) 6AZ4 (42) 6C27 (47)
6CB3 (101) 6CK5 (117) 6EZ0 (27) 6HC5 (18) 6JQ5 (163)
6N2V (99) 7EAG (41) 7ELQ (45) 7MLW (128) 7Q80 (68)
7TZS (80)
Mean quality scores of fold predictions
Model TPR mFPR
Vienna 0.731 0.260
ASMC 0.719 0.245
  • The quality of the fold predictions by ViennaRNA and by ASMC were measured by the true positive rate (TPR), the number of predicted contacts that match native as a fraction of all native contacts, by the modified false positive rate (mFPR), and the number of overpredicted contacts as a fraction of all predicted contacts. Table shows the mean TPR and mFPR scores for Vienna and ASMC for this set. Details are given in Supplemental Table S-01.

This Article

  1. RNA 31: 14-31