Structure and sequence at an RNA template 5′ end influence insertion of transgenes by an R2 retrotransposon protein

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.

Rz cleavage position in rRNA influences 5′ module function for transgene insertion. (A) HDV and designed HDV-like Rz 5′ modules with variable rRNA lengths and cleavage positions within rRNA. 5′ module sequences are aligned to upstream rDNA. (B) Analysis of cleavage from a PP7 hp leader by HDV and designed HDV-like Rzs with variable cleavage positions. (Left) 5′ module Rzs relevant to C and D. (Right) 5′ module Rzs relevant to E and F. Reaction products were separated by 12% Urea-PAGE. (C) Quantification of insertion efficiency of HDV gRz and designed Rzs with −13 and −28 cleavage positions as determined by flow cytometry. Values indicate mean ± SD, n = 3. (D) PCR amplification of 3′ (top) and 5′ (bottom) rDNA-transgene junctions from gDNA in a representative replicate of the experiment in C. (E) Quantification of insertion efficiency of designed Rzs with −21, −24, −28, and −36 cleavage positions as determined by flow cytometry. Values indicate mean ± SD, n = 3. (F) PCR amplification of 3′ (top) and 5′ (bottom) rDNA-transgene junctions from gDNA in a representative replicate of the experiment in E. (G) Depiction of predicted P1 stem base-pairing for WT HDV gRz and GC-depleted mutants (Mut1 and Mut2) with substituted base pairs boxed in red. (H) Quantification of insertion efficiency of WT and GC-depleted mutant HDV gRzs as determined by flow cytometry. Values indicate mean ± SD, n = 3. Normalized fraction of cells expressing GFP relative to WT is indicated in light green.

This Article

  1. RNA 30: 1227-1245