A single natural RNA modification can destabilize a U•A-T-rich RNA•DNA-DNA triple helix

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.

EMSA measurements of the relative stability of 11 modified RNA nucleotides in an R•D-D triple helix. Schematic depicting R•D-D triple helix with the varying position (A) Z•A-T and (E) Z•G-C in red. The putative Watson–Crick and Hoogsteen interactions are represented by a solid line (|) and a dot (•), respectively. The asterisk (*) denotes the location of the 5'-[32P]-radiolabel. Representative gel image for R•D-D triple helix containing the (B) m5U•A-T base triple and (F) m5C•G-C base triple, showing a shift from dsDNA (D-D) to triple helix (R•D-D) as increasing amounts of RNA are added. The binding curve generated from the (C) m5U•A-T and (G) m5C•G-C gel data points. The relative stability of each R•D-D triple helix with (D) Z•A-T base triple and (H) Z•G-C base triple is shown as bar plots. The relative stability was calculated as KD, EMSA(U•A-T)/KD, EMSA(Z•A-T) in panel D and as KD, EMSA(C•G-C)/KD, EMSA(Z•G-C) in panel H. Each bar color represents a specific RNA nucleobase: pink for C, blue for U, green for A, and orange for G. Reported KD, EMSA values and relative stability values are an average of at least three independent replicates, and error bars represent standard deviation.

This Article

  1. RNA 28: 1172-1184