Comparison of CpG- and UpA-mediated restriction of RNA virus replication in mammalian and avian cells and investigation of potential ZAP-mediated shaping of host transcriptome compositions

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

FIGURE 11.
FIGURE 11.

Differences in G + C content and CpG and UpA representation in gene sequences of RNA viruses infecting mammals and birds. Comparison of virus composition between viruses infecting mammals and birds, expressed as fractional differences in G + C content and CpG and UpA dinucleotide representation calculated as f(M)–f(A)/f(All), where f(M) is the mean composition of mammalian viruses, f(A) is of avian viruses, and f(All) is the overall mean. Analyses were performed separately for (A) different virus families and (B) for different segments of flu strains isolated from mammalian (human) and avian sources (duck, chicken). Further analyses of differences between duck and chicken hosts, analyses where recently zoonotic H5N1 strains have been excluded and CpG and UpA representations calculated independently of protein coding are provided in Supplemental Data Table S15. Source sequences are listed in Supplemental Data Tables S10, S11.

This Article

  1. RNA 28: 1089-1109