Biochemical and structural bioinformatics studies of fungal CutA nucleotidyltransferases explain their unusual specificity toward CTP and increased tendency for cytidine incorporation at the 3′-terminal positions of synthesized tails

  1. Rafał Tomecki1,2
  1. 1Laboratory of RNA Biology and Functional Genomics, Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
  2. 2Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland
  3. 3Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Centre of New Technologies, University of Warsaw, 02-089 Warsaw, Poland
  1. Corresponding authors: rtom1916{at}gmail.com, kginal{at}cent.uw.edu.pl
  1. 4These authors contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

Noncanonical RNA nucleotidyltransferases (NTases), including poly(A), poly(U) polymerases (PAPs/PUPs), and C/U-adding enzymes, modify 3′-ends of different transcripts affecting their functionality and stability. They contain PAP/OAS1 substrate-binding domain (SBD) with inserted NTase domain. Aspergillus nidulans CutA (AnCutA), synthesizes C/U-rich 3′-terminal extensions in vivo. Here, using high-throughput sequencing of the 3′-RACE products for tails generated by CutA proteins in vitro in the presence of all four NTPs, we show that even upon physiological ATP excess synthesized tails indeed contain an unprecedented number of cytidines interrupted by uridines and stretches of adenosines, and that the majority end with two cytidines. Strikingly, processivity assays documented that in the presence of CTP as a sole nucleotide, the enzyme terminates after adding two cytidines only. Comparison of our CutA 3D model to selected noncanonical NTases of known structures revealed substantial differences in the nucleotide recognition motif (NRM) within PAP/OAS1 SBD. We demonstrate that CutA specificity toward CTP can be partially changed to PAP or PUP by rational mutagenesis within NRM and, analogously, Cid1 PUP can be converted into a C/U-adding enzyme. Collectively, we suggest that a short cluster of amino acids within NRM is a determinant of NTases’ substrate preference, which may allow us to predict their specificity.

Keywords

  • Received February 20, 2017.
  • Accepted September 12, 2017.

This article is distributed exclusively by the RNA Society for the first 12 months after the full-issue publication date (see http://rnajournal.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After 12 months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

| Table of Contents