Systematic analysis of the Hmga2 3′ UTR identifies many independent regulatory sequences and a novel interaction between distal sites

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.

Regulatory sequences impact gene expression independently of one another within the PIM1 3′ UTR. (A,B) Reporter assays measuring regulatory impact of 100- and 200-nt 3′-UTR fragments (A,B, respectively) tiled across the PIM1 3′ UTR at 100-nt intervals (n = 9; P < 0.05 and 1 × 10−3 indicated by * and **, respectively, Bonferroni-corrected Wilcoxon rank-sum tests). Heatmaps (bottom of each panel) show same data while illustrating tiling strategy; blue arrows indicate location of target sites for miRNAs expressed in A549 cells. (C) The measured regulatory impact of each 200mer fragment (observed, x-axis) modeled as the product of the regulatory impact of constituent 100mer fragments (expected, y-axis), for mouse PIM1 3′-UTR sequences, otherwise as described in Figure 3C. (D) The full-length PIM1 3′ UTR (FL) is repressive (normalized to a no-3′ UTR control [No], n = 9).

This Article

  1. RNA 21: 1346-1360