An S6:S18 complex inhibits translation of E. coli rpsF

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.

(A) Portions of the rpsF operon assessed in this study. (B) β-galactosidase activity of (i) cells with no lacZ reporter transcript induced (−IPTG); (ii) (left axis) cells with the rpsF′-′lacZ transcript induced (+IPTG) and different portions of an exogenous rpsF-priB-rpsR transcript (including an empty vector control) induced (+arabinose) and uninduced (−arabinose); and (iii) (right axis) cells with the rpsO′-′lacZ transcript induced (+IPTG) with the empty vector and the rpsF-priB-rpsR transcript, induced and uninduced (±arabinose). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean for biological replicates. (C) Fold repression of the rpsF′-′lacZ reporter construct derived from data in B. Fold repression is calculated from matched pairs of cultures as (β-galactosidase activity −arabinose)/(β-galactosidase activity +arabinose). Error bars represent standard error of the mean for this calculation for biological replicates. (D) qRT-PCR quantification of the native transcript, rpsF-priB-rpsR-rplI (rplI), overexpressed transcript (rpsF), and reporter transcript (lacZ) relative to the tus control transcript. Error bars represent standard error of the mean for biological replicates.

This Article

  1. RNA 21: 2039-2046