The use of miRNA microarrays for the analysis of cancer samples with global miRNA decrease

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.

Assessment of true down-regulated and false up-regulated miRNAs in Dicer1-deficient samples. Curves showing the number of differentially expressed miRNAs detected by the miRNA microarrays between days 2 and 4, at various FDR cutoffs, for each normalization technique applied (see Table 3). The analyses shown are restricted to 209 miRNAs that were validated as true down-regulated miRNAs by TaqMan RT-qPCR arrays, also present on the Affymetrix platform (see Materials and Methods). The number of miRNAs confirmed to be significantly “true down-regulated” (A) and significantly “false up-regulated” (B), using the qPCR data as a reference, are given. The arrows highlight the better performance of normexp + cyclic loess + RMA and robust normexp + cyclic loess + RMA with array weights, which gives the highest amount of true down-regulated miRNAs at the most stringent FDR cutoffs of 0.05 and 0.1 (A), while giving a minimum of false up-regulated miRNAs (B).

This Article

  1. RNA 19: 876-888