Evaluation of normalization methods in mammalian microRNA-Seq data

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.

Evaluation of normalization methods with QPCR results. (A) ROC plot of sensitivity and specificity of the various normalization methods, based on F-data. The color codes of ROC curves for the normalization methods are the same as those in Figure 2. A “true difference” of value 1 is assigned to the microRNAs whose QPCR expression ratios are at least twofold different between activated and inactivated state, but 0 otherwise. A “predicted difference” is the absolute value of the normalized M-value of microRNA-Seq tag counts. Note: the ROC curves of the scaling and global normalization methods are identical and the global normalization (blue) is superimposed on the scaling method (orange). (B) Linear regression of microRNA-Seq log2 fold change results versus QPCR log2 fold change results based on K-data, over various normalization methods. The correlation coefficient (CC) and R-square (R^2) are two metrics to measure the correlation between the two types of data. The lines are the best linear regression fits to the data. For comparison, all x- and y-axes are uniformized to the same scales.

This Article

  1. RNA 18: 1279-1288