Transient CPEB dimerization and translational control

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

FIGURE 7.
FIGURE 7.

CPEB dimerization ameliorates the deteriorating effect of CPEB overexpression. (A) Expression of exogenous CPEB WT, dimer CPEB-CPEB, and ΔZF mutant. Tubulin served as a loading control. (B) Exogenous CPEB (WT) slowed the rate of oocyte maturation while the CPEB dimer (C-C) had no effect. The maturation rate of dimer expression was significantly faster than that of WT expression (#). (C) Co-expression of luciferase with CPE-containing 3′ UTR shows that exogenous WT CPEB decreased its expression upon GVBD but not the dimeric CPEB. Luciferase expression with CPEB dimer (C-C) was significantly higher than that of CPEB WT (#), similar to noninjected oocytes (NI). On the right, various CPEB expressions did not affect luciferase expression with no CPE in its 3′ UTR (Luc-mt). NI-p, noninjected oocytes without progesterone treatment; NI, noninjected; WT, wild-type CPEB; C-C, tandem CPEB dimers; ΔZF, zinc finger deletion of CPEB. For the statistics, one mark represents P-value < 0.05; two marks represent P-value < 5 × 10−3; three marks represent P-value < 5 × 10−4 as determined by paired t-test.

This Article

  1. RNA 18: 1050-1061