Cotranscriptional splicing efficiency differs dramatically between Drosophila and mouse

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.

Cotranscriptional splicing is twofold less efficient in mouse liver than in Drosophila S2 cells. (A) An image of a typical mouse gene, Peli1, in the Integrated Genome Browser (IGB). (Magenta) pA RNA; (green) NUN RNA; (black) gene structure. (Black bar) 10,000 bp. Note 5′-to-3′ abundance gradient in NUN fraction and abundant read signal within introns. NUN average reads/bp in the exons ∼5.5. (B) Quantitation of intron retention for the introns of Peli1. Intron Retention as 3′SS Ratio = Reads in last 25 bp of Intron/Reads in the first 25 bp of the 3′ exon. (C) Another gene, Agmo/Tmem195, which illustrates greater splicing in the introns closer to the 5′ end of the gene and a mostly unspliced last intron. NUN average reads per base pair in the exons ∼17.4. (D) Quantitation of intron retention for the introns of Agmo/Tmem195. (E) A histogram of intron retention as measured by the 3′SS ratio of all introns in abundantly transcribed genes in mouse and fly. (Blue) Fly NUN RNA; (green) mouse NUN RNA. Total sample size: mouse NUN = 58,493; fly NUN = 20,335 introns.

This Article

  1. RNA 18: 2174-2186