The rocks and shallows of deep RNA sequencing: Examples in the Vibrio cholerae RNome

(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds. If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.

FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.

Comparisons of C-tailing and adapter ligations to the 3′-ends of RNA or ssDNA templates. (A) 3′-end C-tailing reactions were performed with 5′-hydroxyl (5′-OH), 5′-monophosphate (5′-P), and 5′-triphosphate (5′-PPP) group-containing RNAs. The corresponding 5′-monophosphate RNAs served as controls (C). (B) IDT adapter (Liu et al. 2009) ligation to 3′-ends of 5′-monophosphorylated (5′-P) and 5′-triphosphorylated (5′-PPP) RNAs (Table 2). The presence or absence of the IDT adapter in the ligation reaction is indicated above the gel by “+” or “−”, respectively. +ATP or –ATP indicates the presence or absence, respectively, of ATP in the reactions. Potential RNA circularization products are depicted by half-circles. (C) Ligation of different adapters (1-IDT; 2-L2; 3-Ad1RNA; 4-Ad1; 5-UNC; 6-Ad7RNA; 7-Ad7; 8-Ad10) to 3′-ends of 5′-triphosphorylated (5′-PPP) RNAs (Table 2). The corresponding 5′-triphosphorylated RNAs served as controls (C). (D) DNA blot analysis for ligation of L2 and IDT adapters to tailed ssDNAs with ssDNA-specific probes. As controls, ssDNA was incubated in ligation buffer in the absence (C) or presence (CL) of T4 RNA ligase. (AD) Values to the right represent molecular sizes.

This Article

  1. RNA 17: 1357-1366